MAPS Intelligence
Resources/Strategic Tools
Strategic Tools · 9 min read

SWOT analysis and the TOWS matrix: how to do it right

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats: how to gather them with evidence, tell internal from external, and turn the SWOT into action with the TOWS matrix.

Updated October 6, 2026 · MAPS editorial team
In brief

SWOT analysis sorts what you know about a brand or a company into four groups: strengths and weaknesses (internal factors you can control) and opportunities and threats (external factors you can only seize or guard against). On its own it’s a snapshot. It becomes strategy with the TOWS matrix, which crosses the four groups and derives actions from them.

When to use it

  • At the start of a strategy project, to organize what you know before you choose.
  • Before an annual plan or a launch, to see what to lean on and what to protect.
  • When you enter a new market, to compare what you have with what the market demands.
  • To align a team: a well-made SWOT makes explicit the assumptions everyone is reasoning from.

How to do it, in six steps

1. Define the scope

A SWOT applies to an object (a brand, a product line, a company), a market and a time horizon. The same trait can be a strength in Italy and a weakness in Germany: without a scope, the quadrants fill up with statements that can’t be compared.

2. Start from evidence, not opinions

Gather the facts first: market shares, prices, reviews, sales data, consumer research, competitors’ moves. Every item in the SWOT should be able to answer the question “how do we know?” A strength that no data supports is a hypothesis to test, not a strength.

3. Separate internal from external

The test is simple: can you control it? If yes, it’s internal (strength or weakness). If not, it’s external (opportunity or threat). “E-commerce growth in the category” is an opportunity; “our e-commerce site converts poorly” is a weakness.

4. Measure every strength against competitors

A strength is only a strength relative to someone. “Artisanal quality” isn’t a strength if every competitor claims it and delivers it. Ask yourself: do customers see it as a reason to choose us?

5. Weight and cut

Rank items by impact and by strength of evidence, and keep the most important ones: three to five per quadrant is usually enough. A SWOT with twenty items per quadrant doesn’t help anyone choose.

6. Cross them with the TOWS matrix

TOWS relates the quadrants to each other and produces four families of moves:

  • Strengths × Opportunities (SO) — use what you do best to seize what the market is opening up.
  • Weaknesses × Opportunities (WO) — fix a limitation so you don’t miss an opening.
  • Strengths × Threats (ST) — use an advantage to defend against a risk.
  • Weaknesses × Threats (WT) — reduce your exposure where you’re most vulnerable.
An example. An apparel brand has a strength (a recognizable archive of heritage styles) and an opportunity (growing demand for durable and secondhand clothing). The SO move: a program of reissued archive styles, with repairs and take-back of used items. A weakness (limited online presence) facing a threat (competitors growing on marketplaces) leads instead to a WT move: establish a presence on marketplaces with a tight selection, before investing in an e-commerce site of your own.

The most common mistakes

  • Writing actions instead of opportunities. “Launch an e-commerce site” is a move, not an opportunity: the opportunity is the demand that justifies the move.
  • Confusing internal and external. An internal weakness filed under threats stops being something you can act on.
  • Strengths with no comparison. If it doesn’t set you apart from competitors, it isn’t a strength.
  • Items with no evidence. A SWOT made of opinions confirms what the team already thought.
  • Stopping at the SWOT. Without TOWS, the four quadrants stay a list.
  • Never updating it. Markets change: a SWOT from a year ago describes a different market.

SWOT, PEST and competitor analysis

A SWOT doesn’t replace other analyses: it summarizes them. Analysis of the environment (such as PEST: political, economic, social and technological factors) feeds opportunities and threats; competitor analysis tells you which strengths really are strengths. That’s why a good SWOT comes after the research, not in place of it.

How MAPS does it

In MAPS, the SWOT is generated in Analyze from what the project already knows — the market research, the competitors, the consumers — and every item carries its weight and the data it comes from. Then the TOWS matrix crosses the quadrants and proposes moves with their priorities. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats also go into the project’s memory, linked to competitors, channels and segments: the chat can answer “where are we most exposed?” by following those links.

The TOWS matrix in MAPS: the moves that come from crossing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, with their priorities

Frequently asked questions

What’s the difference between SWOT and TOWS?

SWOT lists strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. TOWS crosses them (strengths with opportunities, weaknesses with threats, and so on) to derive strategies. The first describes; the second decides.

How many items should go in each quadrant?

Few, and weighted: usually three to five per quadrant, ranked by impact and strength of evidence. If an item wouldn’t change any decision, you can drop it.

How often should a SWOT be updated?

At least every planning cycle, and whenever the market changes visibly: a new competitor, a price shift, a regulation. Opportunities and threats age faster than strengths and weaknesses.

Should a SWOT be done for the brand or for the company?

For whatever the decision is about. If you need to decide the positioning of a product line, do the SWOT for that line in that market; if you need to decide where to invest as a group, do it for the company.

Origin and references

SWOT emerged in the 1960s in the field of corporate planning; the TOWS matrix was proposed by Heinz Weihrich in 1982 (“The TOWS Matrix — A Tool for Situational Analysis,” Long Range Planning).

Written by the MAPS editorial team with the help of AI, checked and reviewed by the team.

Related articles
Strategic Tools·9 min di lettura

Positioning map: how to build it and read it

The brand and its competitors on two perceived axes: how to choose the right axes, find the white spaces and tell whether they’re worth it.

Read →
Methodology·9 min di lettura

Competitive Intelligence: a method for gathering data that matters

From questions to decisions: how to plan, gather, verify and interpret information on competitors and the market — ethically, with sources and dates.

Read →
Methodology·10 min di lettura

Brand positioning: a four-phase process

Understand, choose, test, activate: how to arrive at a defensible positioning, capture it in one sentence and turn it into concrete choices.

Read →